I think regulations about making use of property to put people up might be changed or relaxed when the full consequences of the pandemic hit after the government assistance is withdrawn or reduced. I think there's a big difference between helping out somebody in need, especially family, and setting up a caravan park for profit in your backyard. They have these ads on tv about homeless people and buying them swags. I reckon if they could find a backyard instead of under a bridge they'd be much safer. I wouldn't mind helping somebody out by letting them pitch a tent in my (huge) backyard.
Ditto
Whenarewethere said
11:03 PM Oct 3, 2020
the rocket wrote:
hufnpuf wrote:
I think regulations about making use of property to put people up might be changed or relaxed when the full consequences of the pandemic hit after the government assistance is withdrawn or reduced. I think there's a big difference between helping out somebody in need, especially family, and setting up a caravan park for profit in your backyard. They have these ads on tv about homeless people and buying them swags. I reckon if they could find a backyard instead of under a bridge they'd be much safer. I wouldn't mind helping somebody out by letting them pitch a tent in my (huge) backyard.
Ditto
Someone crunched the numbers of the cost to the taxpayer of people living under bridges. These people are spending so much time in hospital each year with revolving & compounding illnesses that it would cost less money to house them & improve their health.
Mike Harding said
07:25 AM Oct 4, 2020
Whenarewethere wrote:
Someone crunched the numbers of the cost to the taxpayer of people living under bridges. These people are spending so much time in hospital each year with revolving & compounding illnesses that it would cost less money to house them & improve their health.
In a society as wealthy as ours it is an utter disgrace that anyone is homeless.
hufnpuf said
10:23 AM Oct 4, 2020
Whenarewethere wrote:
Someone crunched the numbers of the cost to the taxpayer of people living under bridges. These people are spending so much time in hospital each year with revolving & compounding illnesses that it would cost less money to house them & improve their health.
They had that as a story line on a tv show "New Amsterdam". The director of the hospital got the hospital to put a "frequent flyer" to the ER up in an apartment because he was costing millions in hospital costs but the apartment costs were not that much.
Ditto
Someone crunched the numbers of the cost to the taxpayer of people living under bridges. These people are spending so much time in hospital each year with revolving & compounding illnesses that it would cost less money to house them & improve their health.
In a society as wealthy as ours it is an utter disgrace that anyone is homeless.
They had that as a story line on a tv show "New Amsterdam". The director of the hospital got the hospital to put a "frequent flyer" to the ER up in an apartment because he was costing millions in hospital costs but the apartment costs were not that much.