what are your thoughts on Pixie skaise returning to melbourne after her husband absconded with a bag full of other peoples cash, estimated to be in the region of two billion dollars
me myself and I, we all reckon she should be stripped of all assets (including that glued on hair) and immediately have the mansion in spain confiscated and sold up, then publicly flogged with a bermaguie thong, if she is an australian citizen (and thats what she is claiming) then she should come under aussie law
I am saddened that christopher (her theiving mongrel husband) died before we were able to seize his assets as well and string him up from the nearest pepper tree
I just dont think that she should be allowed back in to flaunt her illgotten wealth in the face of aussie people, it just doesnt sit right, and if the people of melbourne accept her then they are all queerer than I thought they were, there should be a public uproar that these mongrels are allowed to just escape justice and go on with their lifestyle and that includes corporate bankers
JRH said
02:01 PM Dec 20, 2008
G'day dave,
It's the mum & dad investors who lost their money I feel sorry for. I seem to remember a fairly concerted effort by the Aussie authorities to bring that mongrel thief Christopher back to Oz, and all failed thanks to a non extradition treaty with Spain.
Maybe Pixie now thinks that we have all forgotten what her husband did and feels it is safe to return, and I bet she does not have any intention of giving any money back.
Best Regards and Safe Travelling. John
Bridgee said
05:37 PM Dec 20, 2008
When Christopher Skaise was alive and well, living in Spain, and protected by the Spanish authorities, our family made it a policy not to buy anything made in Spain. I know there's not a lot of Spanish products but we get through a few litres of olive oil so Spanish olive oil was not purchased by us even if it was on special five bucks cheaper than another brand.
I know it was only a token gesture to show our disgust with Spain giving immunity to an Aussie criminal, but it was the principal that mattered.
As for Pixie presuming she has assets and investments worth a few bucks maybe she should be stripped of them just as assets are sometimes siezed from drug dealers / criminals and distributed back to the investors who were ripped off.
But then again if she has no money or assets I guess she'll claim a pension or some kind of welfare payment from us poor taxpayers.
Either way she's bound to get some clever lawyer to argue that she's just the poor unsuspecting wife and was the victim of association by marriage and of course will suffer from memory losses when she's quizzed in court about her knowledge of Christopher's dealings and claim she is financially destitute.. Then she'll be aquiitted and before you know it her mental state suddenly gets better, she starts up a new business, back in the rich list and is soon in Melbourne's "high society" pages.
Just as another failed entrepreneur has managed to do ....... won't mention any names for legal reasons but his last name has something to with Secret Agent 007!
me myself and I, we all reckon she should be stripped of all assets (including that glued on hair) and immediately have the mansion in spain confiscated and sold up, then publicly flogged with a bermaguie thong, if she is an australian citizen (and thats what she is claiming) then she should come under aussie law
I am saddened that christopher (her theiving mongrel husband) died before we were able to seize his assets as well and string him up from the nearest pepper tree
I just dont think that she should be allowed back in to flaunt her illgotten wealth in the face of aussie people, it just doesnt sit right, and if the people of melbourne accept her then they are all queerer than I thought they were, there should be a public uproar that these mongrels are allowed to just escape justice and go on with their lifestyle and that includes corporate bankers
It's the mum & dad investors who lost their money I feel sorry for. I seem to remember a fairly concerted effort by the Aussie authorities to bring that mongrel thief Christopher back to Oz, and all failed thanks to a non extradition treaty with Spain.
Maybe Pixie now thinks that we have all forgotten what her husband did and feels it is safe to return, and I bet she does not have any intention of giving any money back.
Best Regards and Safe Travelling.
John
I know it was only a token gesture to show our disgust with Spain giving immunity to an Aussie criminal, but it was the principal that mattered.
As for Pixie presuming she has assets and investments worth a few bucks maybe she should be stripped of them just as assets are sometimes siezed from drug dealers / criminals and distributed back to the investors who were ripped off.
But then again if she has no money or assets I guess she'll claim a pension or some kind of welfare payment from us poor taxpayers.
Either way she's bound to get some clever lawyer to argue that she's just the poor unsuspecting wife and was the victim of association by marriage and of course will suffer from memory losses when she's quizzed in court about her knowledge of Christopher's dealings and claim she is financially destitute.. Then she'll be aquiitted and before you know it her mental state suddenly gets better, she starts up a new business, back in the rich list and is soon in Melbourne's "high society" pages.
Just as another failed entrepreneur has managed to do ....... won't mention any names for legal reasons but his last name has something to with Secret Agent 007!