check out the new remote control Jockey Wheel SmartBar rearview170 Beam Communications SatPhone Shop Topargee products Enginesaver Low Water Alarms
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Ssanyong Rexton Fuel tank


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Date:
Ssanyong Rexton Fuel tank


Hi all,

I am thinking of buying a new Rexton but the 70litre fuel tank is a put off. Does anybody know if a long range tank can be fitted.

Thanks



-- Edited by Drummo on Monday 18th of September 2023 04:33:38 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 223
Date:

When I had my Great Wall X240 I went to Brown Davis here in Victoria. For the cost of materials only, they fitted bash plates side rock sliders and a long range tank. Same for the Airflow snorkel (down Dromana way). Sometimes being the 1st with a new brand or model for the aftermarket manufacturers to use can have its advantages.

__________________

16.5 Discovery 4 with a few mods and New Age MR 16' Deluxe 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 942
Date:

After having a browse it would seem that a long range tank for the Ssanyong may require a custom tank being made as there wouldn't be much demand for them.

__________________

Kebbin



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Date:

Cheers guys. Thanks for the feed back. I will continue my research and hopefully come up with a solution. I'm in WA, so you would think there would be someone doing custom tanks as every 2nd car here is a full on 4WD. With the distances we have to travel heading north or east between servos a 70 litre tank just wouldn't cut it.
Having said that, I really like the spec of the Rexton for the price and would love to find the solution.
Cheers and thanks for your input.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Drummo wrote:

Hi all,

I am thinking of buying a new Rexton but the 70litre fuel tank is a put off. Does anybody know if a long range tank can be fitted.

Thanks


Hi Chris, Could I say that I'm more than surprised that this vehicle is still being considered after all its deficiencies were pointed out to you late last year when you posted, asking advice? 

To refresh your memory I've included a screen shot where you accepted our advice and said you'd "Give the Rexton a miss for now", which would have been a wise decision. Why the renewed interest? Smooth talking salesman? "Advice" from people with a vested interest? "Advice" from people who don't understand weights?

If you plan to tow a heavyish van, any dreams of safely towing 3500kg with this car is La La Land stuff if the trailer/van is a PIG trailer.

Your old Colorado is a far better bet, or you could look at an older Landcruiser, as per your suggestion. Cheers

 

P.S Absolute max this car can safely tow is 3000kg, with short wheelbase being another problem.

 Don't have rear axle carrying capacity figures with me at moment, but even a 300kg towball weight will add around 500kg.

 

 

 

 

 2C644948-31F5-4969-95D3-6E750AC4D943.jpeg



-- Edited by yobarr on Tuesday 19th of September 2023 11:55:39 AM

Attachments
__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1477
Date:

Hi Drummo Re: "Having said that, I really like the spec of the Rexton for the price and would love to find the solution." Clearly price is your motivation which is reason enough for you and that's fine. Surprisingly no one has asked you what caravan you tow, it's specs etc and you didn't state them last year. Can you do so as it seems several assume you want to tow over 3000kg which is not legally possible. Then we can talk more.

__________________

Be nice... if I wanted my school teacher here I would have invited him... 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 942
Date:

I think Drummo is asking about a long range fuel tank not "what should I buy" he has either made up his mind or is continuing to appraise the situation.

__________________

Kebbin



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Kebbin wrote:

I think Drummo is asking about a long range fuel tank not "what should I buy" he has either made up his mind or is continuing to appraise the situation.


Hi Kebbin, In his initial post Drummo mentioned the Rexton's 3500kg towing "ability", but recognised that this was only "good in theory".

This suggests that he was looking to tow a heavier van, or that claim capacity wouldn't have been important to him.

My input was merely to express surprise that this car remained on the shopping list, given that it has no chance of safely towing 3500kg as a PIG trailer, as was explained to him last year.

Like many things in life you get what you pay for.

"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten". Cheers

P.S Chris would do well to consider a Landcruiser 100 or 105 for similar money and better quality than a new Rexton.

 



-- Edited by yobarr on Wednesday 20th of September 2023 12:37:40 PM

__________________

v



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Date:

Hi all,

I love the responses so far. Whether you think I should or should not buy a Rexton, it seems you are genuinely interested in my dilemma and I really appreciate that.
FYI I am towing a 2013 Concept Belmont XLT 22' with an ATM of around 2900 ( the vans in for a service so I cant read the plate).

By the way I really love the van. It is fantastic.

I'll let you know how I end up with this.

The renewed interest in the Rexton is due to some local Australian reviews. I haven't even test drove one yet, but wont bother unless I can resolve the fuel capacity issue.

Cheers to all.



-- Edited by Drummo on Wednesday 20th of September 2023 01:36:27 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Drummo wrote:

Hi all,

I love the responses so far. Whether you think I should or should not buy a Rexton, it seems you are genuinely interested in my dilemma and I really appreciate that.
FYI I am towing a 2013 Concept Belmont XLT 22' with an ATM of around 2900 ( the vans in for a service so I cant read the plate).

By the way I really love the van. It is fantastic.

I'll let you know how I end up with this.

The renewed interest in the Rexton is due to some local Australian reviews. I haven't even test drove one yet, but wont bother unless I can resolve the fuel capacity issue.

Cheers to all.


 Hi Chris, thanks for acknowledging our efforts to help. Could I please ask that you look on your compliance plate, on one of the inner door pillars I've been told, to determine your rear axle carrying capacity, as this is critical to your decision.

My efforts to find this have been frustrated by people who claim not to know, but are more intent on selling me a new car! BAD sign.

Your 290kg towball weight (generally recognised 10% of ATM) will put well over 400kg onto your car's rear axle, which I believe will be your stumbling point. 

Today I will renew my efforts to help you by determining that capacity. Cheers

P.S BEWARE of 'reviews' by motor magazines as they're unlikely to bite the hand that feeds them. ( Think Advertising)

 



-- Edited by yobarr on Wednesday 20th of September 2023 03:51:56 PM

__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1477
Date:

Hi Drummo Well you don't "get what you pay for" you "get what you can afford" and obviously you have a budget. Something many people don't take into account. The Rexton shapes up well in many areas but I question its ability to pull your van the way you hope it will. 2.2L diesel 8 speed auto towing north of 2700kg is a worry and here's why. My SUV has 2.0L diesel 8 speed auto and pulls our 1600kg (ATM) van easily. You want to tow near double that. I doubt you'll be happy and even with over 440nm of torque it won't have reserve when you'd like it. But as budget is why you pursue this a Ford Everest 3.0L diesel, more capable is out of the question at over $80,000 on the road. Hence I'd look at a tug with better towing ability that will crunch the weights better as well that could be 2-3 year old. An engine less labouring is a mind less worrying...

__________________

Be nice... if I wanted my school teacher here I would have invited him... 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Eaglemax wrote:

Hi Drummo Well you don't "get what you pay for"  you "get what you can afford"  and obviously you have a budget. Something many people don't take into account. The Rexton shapes up well in many areas but I question its ability to pull


         You most certainly will "get what you can afford" if all else fails, but it seems that Drummo is looking to spend upwards of $50,000 on a new vehicle that is not really a good towing car. 

Since he is looking at a new vehicle above $50,000 I doubt that Drummo is short of funds so surely it makes more sense to use the funds he's allocated to this vehicle to purchase a vehicle that is more suited to towing, and may be a year or two old, rather than buying an unsuitable new vehicle? Warranties are not worth Two Bob if your little Buzz Box cries "enough" when you're in the back of beyond. Only milk and juice come in 2 litres.

Buying El Cheapo is false economy when we're talking tow cars. When I was looking for tow vehicles I made a list of requirements, and I tested many models including LC200s and new BIG Yank tanks before settling on a used 79 series Cruiser.                                Reliable, good resale value, and it safely and legally tows 3500kg, with ease.

Do it once. Do it well. Good luck to Chris with his research, but little cars towing big vans is a recipe for disaster.

There's myriad more suitable vehicles in the price range he's chosen. Cheers

 

407F4145-A443-47FA-A37E-21A045247D59.png



-- Edited by yobarr on Wednesday 20th of September 2023 03:53:50 PM

Attachments
__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1477
Date:

Good to see you repeated what I said Yobarr but was unnecessary. Drummo, if, if, you still want to pursue the 4 cylinder route may I suggest the Mitsubishi Pajero 2023. All the weights are in this link and price is in the ball park. They even comment on how it tows 2500kg caravan with concerns. https://autoexpert.com.au/questions-answers/can-mitsubishi-pajero-sport-tow-a-heavy-caravan

__________________

Be nice... if I wanted my school teacher here I would have invited him... 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1477
Date:

https://www.browndavis.com.au/mitsubishi-pajero-sport-2015-present-112-litre-replacement-long-range-tank/

__________________

Be nice... if I wanted my school teacher here I would have invited him... 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Eaglemax wrote:

https://www.browndavis.com.au/mitsubishi-pajero-sport-2015-present-112-litre-replacement-long-range-tank/


Mitsubishi is good lightweight car, and I note that the max towball weight has been now been upgraded to a more sensible 310kg, or the generally accepted  10% of tow capacity.

However,GVM is very low at 2775kg, and remember that this can never be achieved when towing.

GCM is only 5565kg, and you'll never be able to load car so that weight on wheels is at least 10% greater than weight on wheels of the van, necessary for safe towing. GVM would have to be much higher to achieve that  figure.

And, as always, the miserable 1600kg rear axle capacity on the car is the main problem.

Why do manufacturers constantly try to confuse buyers with figures like these?

With 3100kg tow capacity and 5565kg GCM, the car can weigh only 2465kg. Behave! Cheers

Cheers

 



-- Edited by yobarr on Wednesday 20th of September 2023 04:40:03 PM

__________________

v



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Date:

Hi Guru,

I love the picsmile 

I'll keep the search going. I have checked out some older cruisers...man..some are still asking over $100k for 7 year old cars with 150k on the clockconfuse. But there are some older ones in my price range that may be worth a look.

 

Cheers



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Drummo wrote:

Hi Guru,

I love the picsmile 

I'll keep the search going. I have checked out some older cruisers...man..some are still asking over $100k for 7 year old cars with 150k on the clockconfuse. But there are some older ones in my price range that may be worth a look.

Cheers


 Great to hear that we were able to help. Far too many people get misled by deceptive advertising, and the spiel of commission-based salesmen who have NO interest in you, other than relieving you of as much cash as possible.

ANY Cruiser is a better bet than a 4 cylinder Buzz Box that will rev its guts out for little positive result, and likely die under the strain!

Good luck with your search, and always feel free to ask the forum for help if you think we can help you. Cheers

P.S Always there are bargains to be had if you let it be known among friends, car dealers, workmates etc what you're after. My 79 series V8 Landcruiser, only one owner with 121,000 km on it, was bought for $40,000. (Folding money!). Worth a LOT more than that.

Always easy to seal a bargain deal if you have cash on you, and wave it at the seller!

 



-- Edited by yobarr on Wednesday 20th of September 2023 06:46:24 PM

__________________

v



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 223
Date:

I am at loss as to why recent posters are talking about other cars and aftermarket accessories other than what the OP asked for. He asked a very specific question for a very specific brand of vehicle. He even thanked people who responded. Yet now we are back on weights and towing and every other type of car. There is a forum for towing. Perhaps the posts can be shifted there?

__________________

16.5 Discovery 4 with a few mods and New Age MR 16' Deluxe 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1477
Date:

There is no option for a larger fuel tank for the Rexton. That was his concern. The Pajero is similar size, also 7 seater, power torque and has an outlet that will fit a much larger tank in 3 1/2 hours. Similar price too and I pointed out. But if you are referring to the v8 guzzler then that's way off topic. ;)

__________________

Be nice... if I wanted my school teacher here I would have invited him... 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Eaglemax wrote:

There is no option for a larger fuel tank for the Rexton. That was his concern. The Pajero is similar size, also 7 seater, power torque and has an outlet that will fit a much larger tank in 3 1/2 hours. Similar price too and I pointed out. But if you are referring to the v8 guzzler then that's way off topic. ;)


 But it has no chance of safely towing a 2900 ATM van. 

Please refer to my post of 4.12pm yesterday for details.Cheers

P.S The reference to my V8 car was simply to illustrate that bargains are about if you look for them. Surely it would be pointless to say that I got a bargain without details? And for your reference my car uses 17.2 litres/100 km while running at 6800kg. That's good enough for me.



-- Edited by yobarr on Thursday 21st of September 2023 07:35:51 PM

__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1306
Date:

Might find a fuel tank at the wreckers or someone wrecking a Rexton that happens
to have a bigger tank. Just a thought.

__________________

Ex software engineer, now chef



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

deverall11 wrote:

Might find a fuel tank at the wreckers or someone wrecking a Rexton that happens
to have a bigger tank. Just a thought.


 Great idea but doesn't address  the fact that a Rexton has NO chance of safely towing a 2900kg caravan as a PIG trailer. None.

Bit silly encouraging  those new to caravanning to set out in a totally unsuitable vehicle on a dream journey that is likely to quickly turn into a disaster. But I guess you're only dead once.

The dangers of weight were again illustrated to me just this morning when I set sail in my 3650kg car towing a 19'6 van that has 3150kg on its axles. (6800kg all up) With the car being 16% heavier than the van normally it tows like a dream, but this morning, on bitumen, the van was throwing the car around something wicked, so I stopped to investigate. 

Yesterday I had 4 new tyres fitted to the car, and had the car's wheels transferred to the van, as I usually do when I purchase a new set of tyres. For some inexplicable reason the tyreshop had put 60psi in the lead axle of the van and 40psi in the rear axle.         Ridiculous, but again highlights the stupidity of trying to tow heavy weights with a light car as it likely would have upended any of the current crop of utes with their claimed 6000kg GCM.

If safety is of ANY concern, ALWAYS the car should have at least 10% more weight on its wheels than is on the wheels of any van it is towing. Cheers



-- Edited by yobarr on Friday 22nd of September 2023 12:02:33 PM

__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1477
Date:

yobarr wrote:
Eaglemax wrote:

There is no option for a larger fuel tank for the Rexton. That was his concern. The Pajero is similar size, also 7 seater, power torque and has an outlet that will fit a much larger tank in 3 1/2 hours. Similar price too and I pointed out. But if you are referring to the v8 guzzler then that's way off topic. ;)


 But it has no chance of safely towing a 2900 ATM van. 

Please refer to my post of 4.12pm yesterday for details.Cheers

P.S The reference to my V8 car was simply to illustrate that bargains are about if you look for them. Surely it would be pointless to say that I got a bargain without details? And for your reference my car uses 17.2 litres/100 km while running at 6800kg. That's good enough for me.



-- Edited by yobarr on Thursday 21st of September 2023 07:35:51 PM


 But always mentioning your 79 is "eternally bleating"  



__________________

Be nice... if I wanted my school teacher here I would have invited him... 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Eaglemax wrote:
yobarr wrote:
Eaglemax wrote:

There is no option for a larger fuel tank for the Rexton. That was his concern. The Pajero is similar size, also 7 seater, power torque and has an outlet that will fit a much larger tank in 3 1/2 hours. Similar price too and I pointed out. But if you are referring to the v8 guzzler then that's way off topic. ;)


 But it has no chance of safely towing a 2900 ATM van. 

Please refer to my post of 4.12pm yesterday for details.Cheers

P.S The reference to my V8 car was simply to illustrate that bargains are about if you look for them. Surely it would be pointless to say that I got a bargain without details? And for your reference my car uses 17.2 litres/100 km while running at 6800kg. That's good enough for me.


 But always mentioning your 79 is "eternally bleating". 


 Not at all. Because you seem to be ignorant of the meaning of the word "bleating" I have included a screen shot.

You can rest assured that I have no reason to resort to "bleating" when my car is mentioned, because I have nothing to bleat about.

Nothing compares nor competes. Cheers

 

 

932A923C-B098-42A6-8C23-BD287F98AA35.jpeg



Attachments
__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1477
Date:

Been reading up on the Mitsubishi Triton twin cab diesel. Kerb weight 1920kg, GVM 2900kg, towing capacity 3100kg, CVM 5880kg don't know about rear axle loading. $52,000 Tony

__________________

Be nice... if I wanted my school teacher here I would have invited him... 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Eaglemax wrote:

Been reading up on the Mitsubishi Triton twin cab diesel. Kerb weight 1920kg, GVM 2900kg, towing capacity 3100kg, CVM 5880kg don't know about rear axle loading. $52,000 Tony


 Rear axle is 1840kg but safe tow capacity is 2900kg, absolute TOPS. Cheers

66D22D9E-477A-455B-AB2D-76F57C13BE67.png



-- Edited by yobarr on Monday 9th of October 2023 11:35:04 AM

Attachments
__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 7579
Date:

It intrigues me why all these dual cabs & similar vehicles don't have the rear axle a bit further back.



__________________

Procrastination, mankind's greatest labour saving device!

50L custom fuel rack 6x20W 100/20mppt 4x26Ah gel 28L super insulated fridge TPMS 3 ARB compressors heatsink fan cooled 4L tank aftercooler Air/water OCD cleaning 4 stage car acoustic insulation.

KJB


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 844
Date:

Whenarewethere wrote:

It intrigues me why all these dual cabs & similar vehicles don't have the rear axle a bit further back.


 Because they generally use the same chassis as for single cab version.......



__________________

KB



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1477
Date:

yobarr wrote:
Eaglemax wrote:

Been reading up on the Mitsubishi Triton twin cab diesel. Kerb weight 1920kg, GVM 2900kg, towing capacity 3100kg, CVM 5880kg don't know about rear axle loading. $52,000 Tony


 Rear axle is 1840kg but safe tow capacity is 2900kg, absolute TOPS. Cheers

66D22D9E-477A-455B-AB2D-76F57C13BE67.png



-- Edited by yobarr on Monday 9th of October 2023 11:35:04 AM


 Firstly my old mate lol ... that pic, that was towing something also.  Now, yes I was aware of 2900kg tops towing but kerb weight 1920kg as opposed to 2256kg a difference of 336 kg. That would make a huge difference Yabarr. (Are you proud of me yet?  lol)



__________________

Be nice... if I wanted my school teacher here I would have invited him... 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1477
Date:

To follow up, yes these utes are medium duty utes. as per autoexpert.com.au/posts/how-to-bend-your-ute

The reason I'd go the triton is not to load it up with 900kg then attach the van. No, but worse case senario is towing say 2800kg leaving 280kg on the towball and if you had a 500kg load including two passengers its it quite safe  P.S there a Toyota LC with bent chassis on the site. :)
Tony



-- Edited by Eaglemax on Monday 9th of October 2023 06:44:27 PM

__________________

Be nice... if I wanted my school teacher here I would have invited him... 

1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Purchase Grey Nomad bumper stickers Read our daily column, the Nomad News The Grey Nomad's Guidebook