check out the new remote control Jockey Wheel SmartBar Topargee products Enginesaver Low Water Alarms
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Big van & small tug???


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6159
Date:
Big van & small tug???


It doesn't quite look right to me.

Aussie Paul. smile

 



Attachments
__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3066
Date:

Either posed Photo Paul.

Or a total idiot.
His insurance would cover absolutely nothing there I'd think?.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 161
Date:

Best think again then. Not saying it's a great idea, but if not heavily loaded internally this could easily be legal and therefore insurable.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5540
Date:

If my guess is right, the tow vehicle is a Landrover, has a very high tow rating along with a very good towball rating.

Then with out guessing the caravan is a Jayco unless doctored up a with couple of extra water tanks throw in extra frig or two, nay they are general lighter then some most caravans.

Before anyone said its sitting low. Landrover have auto ride height. It sitting down until the motor starts.

Its legal.



-- Edited by Radar on Wednesday 28th of June 2017 11:47:39 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1482
Date:

Reckon Europe has it right. Towed vehicle be it Caravan whatever can only be 80% of the weight of the Tug.

Here the Industry are talking about Four Ton vans.................................



__________________

 

 

 

 

Safe Travels



Chief one feather

Status: Offline
Posts: 17416
Date:

I can't be 100% sure but I think I have seen that posted on the forum as someones rig, Paul. I have had a quick look around but can't find it. 

You haven't bought a new tug recently have you biggrin



__________________

Live Life On Your Terms

DOUG  Chief One Feather  (Losing feathers with age)

TUG.......2014 Holden LT Colorado Twin Cab Ute with Canopy

DEN....... 2014 "Chief" Arrow CV  (with some changes)

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 754
Date:

It's Range Rover Sport. Tow cap 3500kgs, ball load 250kgs. Looks to me like a 2011/12ish model. Can't see the problem.

__________________

Cheers,

Tony

"Opinion is the medium between ignorance and knowledge" - Plato  

 The moral: Focus on the Facts

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 415
Date:

Maybe not sensible but totally legal. As said above Range Rover Sport.

__________________
brian


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6159
Date:

Legal does NOT mean safeno

Aussie Paul. smile



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 7642
Date:

Hey speak for yourself !! Lol

__________________
Whats out there


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 25
Date:

If its the 4.4 CDI  Range Rover (i used to work at factory ) its 740 Nm  and 250 K watt  . might be OK.



-- Edited by DAVEY123 on Thursday 29th of June 2017 05:03:09 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 155
Date:

Different to the old days, this is a pic from our 4 week holiday in 1969 towing a 30' van behind out stock standard Mk2 Zephyr.

img4712.jpg

Cheers,



Attachments
__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3066
Date:

Yes Gringo.

BUT. Roads were nowhere near so busy. traffic more "lazy".

The whole world travelled at a different speed.

MY first van was a 28ft behind Land Rover in 'late '63 (UK)
20\25mph was usual when towing.
AND NOBODY WHINGED.

Unfortunately..... We all looking for the angels nowadays.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 7642
Date:

Yea we had bad roads here too !! Lol

__________________
Whats out there


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1082
Date:

aussie_paul wrote:

Legal does NOT mean safeno

Aussie Paul. smile


 Dead right.

It is my opinion, in the interest of safe towing that the loaded weight of the tug should exceed the loaded van by at least 10%.

Not a legal requirement......but not safe either.

 

Montie



__________________

Monty. RV Dealer.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1896
Date:

If that's a Range Rover Sport and has the towing specs quoted, the van looks like it's a 25' Jayco Sterling with a slide out, the weights quoted on used caravan sites for this van are around 2200kg tare, 2700/2800 ATM so why would it not be legal ?  In terms of safety I would rather own this rig than the one pictured below from the 60s even if as Macca suggested there was less traffic on the roads. The Zephyr had virtually no safety features to protect it's passengers, the suspension was probably stock standard, the van's suspension was basic and it wouldn't have had anything like a WDH, electric braking or sway control to help control the load - to top it all off the roads in Australia were utter crap. I doubt there were towing courses available in the 60s and it would have been highly unlikely that the authorities would have pulled you over and checked your weights .. compared to the past maybe we are not in quite as bad a situation as some people like to make out.  confuse 



__________________

DavRo

2018 Grand Cherokee Limited - 2022 Concorde 2000



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1477
Date:

Poor old Zephyr. A 2.5 litre 6 cylinder towing that old girl...lol. 2nd gear all the way I guess. Friend of mine had a Ford Ranch wagon towing a 28FT Franklin. About 50ft rig. Quite a site.

__________________

Be nice... if I wanted my school teacher here I would have invited him... 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 7642
Date:

There wasn't much better around at the time !

__________________
Whats out there


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 754
Date:

Not sure what road conditions have to do with it. The RR's ability wouldn't be an issue, it's a mule and more than capable of hauling that Jayco and no less so than Prado, Pajero etc. I think once again we're being led (by some) into the world of "if it's not in the magic 4 it's not up to the job" yawn



-- Edited by SouthernComfort on Friday 30th of June 2017 08:29:18 AM

__________________

Cheers,

Tony

"Opinion is the medium between ignorance and knowledge" - Plato  

 The moral: Focus on the Facts

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3066
Date:

Nothing to do with the "Magic 4" Tony.

I've got a D-Max 2010. but did have 2 x patrols prior to,

It's ALL to do with SENSIBLE Weight ratios and lengths.
Long van. Short tug. Equates to LOTS of leverage from behind.

Can make tyre grip on roads rather tenuous at times.

Weights. Read on here Posts galore.

Sensible SAFE loads equate to as near 1\2 ton as possible MORE weight in tug than van.

Nearer the half ton the better.

Mine is 3t rated,with 2 ton van.

These people with the BIG. Heavy vans.
Regardless of weight figures stated on paper.
WILL have lots of problems when they do FINALLY
get their act together regarding weight scales and checks.

NONE of the current veh's sold over the counter can safely tow these huge vans being rolled out now. and getting bigger.
IF BOTH LOADED...

Once weight added, It negates t'other tow capabilities with 99% of them.

There will be a lot of small trucks and licences being changed.
OR. More sensibly. LOTS of huge vans in dealers yards.
NOT able to sell.

The correct way to go.
There's no NEED for those bloody things.

Ideal long term tourer for 2. = around 6.5 mtr semi OFFroad.

General vanning.
16ft to 18ft. Preferably full height and Tandem with largest ones.
I hate ducking and banging head in doorway.

Semi OFF, RTeason being that they built stronger. Actual BOLTS in them
Not just staples and glue.
And NEVER buy a van with PINE frame. Even the treated pine.
Meranti MINIMUM.
Pine is good for firewood at best.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 754
Date:

macka17 wrote:


.......Pine is good for firewood at best.


 So long as it's not treated mate, that'd be a life shortener! biggrin



__________________

Cheers,

Tony

"Opinion is the medium between ignorance and knowledge" - Plato  

 The moral: Focus on the Facts

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1840
Date:

It looks marginally OK to me. More worrying was a Subaru Forrester with 2 large fishing canoes on top towing a dual axle van that would have weighed at least 2,000kg that we saw a few days ago. Duck for cover, it's getting dangerous out there!

__________________

Cheers Keith & Judy

Don't take life too seriously, it never ends well.

Trip Reports posted on feathersandphotos.com.au Go to Forums then Trip Reports.

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1353
Date:

Eaglemax wrote:

Poor old Zephyr. A 2.5 litre 6 cylinder towing that old girl...lol. 2nd gear all the way I guess. Friend of mine had a Ford Ranch wagon towing a 28FT Franklin. About 50ft rig. Quite a site.





If memory serves me and I'm not mistaken the old Zephyr was only a three speed box to start with.

__________________
In life it is important to know when to stop arguing with people and simply let them be wrong.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 754
Date:

landy wrote:
Eaglemax wrote:

Poor old Zephyr. A 2.5 litre 6 cylinder towing that old girl...lol. 2nd gear all the way I guess. Friend of mine had a Ford Ranch wagon towing a 28FT Franklin. About 50ft rig. Quite a site.



 



If memory serves me and I'm not mistaken the old Zephyr was only a three speed box to start with.


 Yes, three on the tree. The Mk 3 Zephyr came with four on the tree, and Mk4 had four on the floor (Mk4 was never imported/sold in AU). Apologies for the useless trivia!



__________________

Cheers,

Tony

"Opinion is the medium between ignorance and knowledge" - Plato  

 The moral: Focus on the Facts

 

msg


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1768
Date:

Not sure, but the MK2 Zephyr would have been quite old in 1969. My husband had one in about 1967. It wasn't young then. Dad used to tow a caravan with a soft top Vauxhall. Slept the six of us. More trivia.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1353
Date:

Nothing wrong with a bit of trivia. Just got to check and see if it is allowed in Techies corner. biggrinbiggrin

__________________
In life it is important to know when to stop arguing with people and simply let them be wrong.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1353
Date:

Mark 2 Zepher ran from 1956 to 1962 according to Wikipedia.

__________________
In life it is important to know when to stop arguing with people and simply let them be wrong.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 754
Date:

landy wrote:

Mark 2 Zepher ran from 1956 to 1962 according to Wikipedia.


Such good cars, strong as an Ox. Always loved Zephyr's, and especially the luxury model Zodiac - that was the pinnacle!



__________________

Cheers,

Tony

"Opinion is the medium between ignorance and knowledge" - Plato  

 The moral: Focus on the Facts

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 141
Date:

Change the camera angle and it will look totally okay..................................................I saw a Kluger towing a 20ft van down in Vic, mate and I were amazed.


__________________

Checking out the places I drove past a thousand times................

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3066
Date:

Anglia.Then Consul. Zephyr 4. (pot). Zephyr 6 (pot) Zodiac.

Equal to our Falcon. Fairmont, and Fairlane.

Best tractor on the road was the old Valiants.

but you had to tow a tanker behind it.

Holdens apart from the big Block Chevvy one.
were all underpowered, Gutless. terrible seat comfort, vehicles.
After the old HQ.
No good to tow with that one.,
but lovely 149 donk. Smooth as.

Same as those Toyota 4wd,s. Ute and wagon.

Till they put 4 valves in the 100 head. Then brought out the V8,
they were all sewing machines.
Gutless as. Standard.

That's why you couldn't kill them.
They wouldn't go anywhere to start with. chuckle.

__________________
1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Purchase Grey Nomad bumper stickers Read our daily column, the Nomad News The Grey Nomad's Guidebook