My Sensar III HDTV (RV-3095) has died for the second time. While this time may be the same as previously when white parrots (well, technically the large white sulphur crested ones are parrots whereas the official name would run afoul of the auto censorship) chewed through the co-axial cable and if that had happened would easily be fixed. (I haven't been up on a ladder yet.) However, I am tired of rotating the antenna to get the best picture every time we stop at different towns and if I have to replace that antenna I am considering fitting one of the omni- direction dome type antennas.
A look through Caravans Plus listing of antennas shows that they have both the Sensar III and Freevision Sensar together with about nine models of the omni-direction dome antennas. The dome type antennas are considerably cheaper than the Sansars, so providing their performance was at least equal to the Sansars would make them more attractive.
And no more back and forth lining up the antenna to find the best picture!
Has anyone had experience with one of the omni-directional TV antennas?
Top Omnidirectional Antennas for Australian Caravans (2026)
These are the current stand-outs based on recent buyer guides, caravan forums, and installer feedback. All are roof-mount, 12V, DVB-T digital, and include amplification.
1. Milenco Power 900L / Power 900
Why its popular: Highest claimed gain of any omni (up to 38 dB), excellent low-signal performance, 4G/5G compatible, very durable for Australian outback conditions. No rotation, no crank.
Best for: Remote or fringe areas.
Looks like a large white low-profile dome.
2. Winegard Air 360 (or Air 360+)
Why its popular: Super-low noise figure (around 1 dB best in class), rugged build, great all-round reception, some models include AM/FM radio. Fixed roof mount no moving parts.
Best for: Reliability and build quality on long trips.
Looks like a sleek black (or white) compact dome.
3. Cowfish VanTenna (Australian-made)
Why its popular: Specifically designed for Australian signals picks up both horizontal and vertical polarization (a big advantage in regional areas). Compact, modern design, built-in high-gain amp.
Best for: Users who want local support and the latest tech. Many caravanners who upgraded from older Winegards switched to this or the Milenco.
Looks like a clean white aerodynamic.
From Grok. Check out suppliers and fitting options online.
Yes, I am the same as LW about this topic. I too, am seeking Nomads who have an omni directional antenna who could provide an opinion on the operation of these antennas.
More interested in the sensitivity of reception and if capable of dual polarization reception. A lot of specs out there can only be regarded as exaggerated claims, especially those
that claim 100km reception.
I currently have the Winegard dual polarity wind-up, which is fine in close proximity to transmitters. There is a huge difference in transmitter power output as you travel around the country.
Regional Centre's transmit on much higher outputs than small country towns, that have localized transmission outputs. I usually free camp 10-20 km from such small towns and the Winegard struggles
to receive reception in these situations. Finding the best antenna direction can be a pain only to be able to receive one or possibly two channels. No problem if near a Regional Centre, and in some cases
with a distance of 10-50km.
Would like to hear from those Nomads who have an omni directional antenna.
__________________
Cheers, Richard (Dick0)
"Home is where the Den is parked, Designer Orchid Special 21' towed by Jeep Diesel Grand Cherokee Limited"
"4x250W solar panels, 360w solar blanket, Epever 80A charger and 4x135Ah Voltax Prismatic LiFePO4 Batteries".
Why not consider a pole-mounted directional antenna that you can rotate at ground level?
My first van I did have a pole mounted Yagi type uhf antenna. Had the same problems and you needed to know the transmitting polarization, then reposition the antenna 90deg and the whole exercise
was quite cumbersome including lugging around a pole and home type antenna. Which is why the current van has the Winegard.
Your premise is fine, but the undertaking is most awkward.
__________________
Cheers, Richard (Dick0)
"Home is where the Den is parked, Designer Orchid Special 21' towed by Jeep Diesel Grand Cherokee Limited"
"4x250W solar panels, 360w solar blanket, Epever 80A charger and 4x135Ah Voltax Prismatic LiFePO4 Batteries".
Friends replaced their antenna with a dual-polarization, omni-directional antenna (hint: a cross between a farm animal and a piscatorial creature) and arrrived at the Noosa River Caravan Park looking very smug until they tried to tune their TV set. The tuner picked up over 100 channels but when they tried to look at a station, it was largely unwatchable due to pixellization. When we looked at a specific channel and drilled down to see what frequency it was broadcasting on, we found that it was picking up the transmitter from Bald Knob, 50 kilometres away and ignoring the local vertically-polarised transmitter at Mt Tinbeerwah, only 8 km away.
The TV set was choosing the lowest frequency it found and was ignoring stronger signals of a higher frequency. Also because the antenna was omni-directional, it was picking up everything around a 360 degree field of view. In this case the solution was to delete every channel and to manually tune each transmitted from Mt Tinbeerwah. Even so, they did not get a perfect picture all the time even though they were relatively close to the transmitter. The original Winegard batwing antenna on a friend's 20 year-old van near them outperformed it.
Another friend arrived also having retrofitted a similar antenna and had the same problem. His solution was to replace the TV set with the new one appearing to only choose the strongest signal.
Omni-directional antennas are usually a poor compromise and will never perform as well as a directional antenna. Think of a lighthouse which requires an omni-directional light to be seen 30km or so away. It is executed by having a highly directional light beam which is continually rotated.
The problem with the Winegard antennas is that they are not waterproof and the amplifier in each lobe corrodes and deteriorates with time. In addition the holes in the antennas allow mud wasps, spiders and ants in and whose secretion wreak havoc with the printed circuit boards. With a Winegard antenna, it is prudent to waterproof them and cover the holes with insect mesh. There can be an additional issue with the Winegard Sensar HV antenna (the snowflake). In certain places the signal from the upper lobe (for horizontal polarizaion) can be out of phase with the signal from the lower lobe (vertical polarization). This can result in poor signal quality.
Unfortunately I do not believe there is a perfect caravan TV antenna; each is a compromise. Caveat Emptor!