Hmm, I seem to recall a not entirely dissimilar situation in 1936 that impacted the serenity of the rich and famous in Buck house. History repeating itself?????
(The post is a comment on the current situation and does not necessarily reflect the views of the poster)
__________________
Those who wish to reap the blessings of freedom must, as men, endure the fatigue of defending it.
I wish them well. Cant be easy for either of them. Harry can use his excellent chopper skills for many opportunities eg rescue and Meghan can feel less inside a cocoon as Diana felt.
Tony
__________________
Be nice... if I wanted my school teacher here I would have invited him...
Indeed. Prince Harry actually served in combat until the newspapers outed his identity, so the army had to pull him out. Plus all the work he has done in Paralympics and for the disabled, including war vets. And I don't imagine that Meghan enjoys the Paparazzi any more than the Late Lady Dianna did, although her previous career was a good prep for being able to handle the media. I guess too they want to bring their kids up as normal children. And they are about 6th in line for the throne or something? Old Lizzie won't abdicate in favour of son Charlie [although there is some method in her madness there]. In any case, they have done far more for the Royal family than Prince Andrew and his best [and late] mate Jeffrey Epstein, who both seem to have had a taste for molesting teenagers.
None of us has a clue whats really going on. If thats the worst thats happening in the world then the world is doing all right. while we are looking at their problems we are not looking at our own. Thats gotta be a positive. Stay sane.
None of us has a clue whats really going on. If thats the worst thats happening in the world then the world is doing all right. while we are looking at their problems we are not looking at our own. Thats gotta be a positive. Stay sane.
Well, it seems that the Queen has cut them adrift. From my perspective, they are better off out of it. They will survive, the taxpayer gets a good deal, although I am not sure that repaying for their renovations was really fair on them. They both have marketable skills and connections, so they won't probably starve, or even have to live in discomfort.
Harry was a conscript though being born into it, but he served his time, and served the Royal family and Britain well. And Meghan has served her time too. it is a pity in a way, because I think Meghan and Harry would have made a good, modern Royal King and Queen, within that mind-set of having a Royalty, which is another question.
Andrew didn't do anything wrong, the age of consent in the UK is 16 without conditions.
It's not possible, surely, that all these women who have suddenly decided 10 or 20 years after the event that they were "abused" in some way are seeing dollar signs... is it...?
__________________
"I beseech you in the bowels of Christ think it possible you may be mistaken"
Oliver Cromwell, 3rd August 1650 - in a letter to the General Assembly of the Kirk of Scotland
The Media is having a field day with this young couple.
I guess that my question is also along the same path as the media.
It sort of now has me asking the Question.
Here goes.
Is Harry the son of Prince Charles.????
I am just asking.
Jay&Dee
-- Edited by JayDee on Tuesday 21st of January 2020 04:44:39 AM
-- Edited by JayDee on Tuesday 21st of January 2020 04:45:53 AM
from what I've read and seen on TV Diana had the relationship with that red headed captain well after she had Harry. But a DNA would put the matter to sleep....if indeed Charlie is his dad
Tony
__________________
Be nice... if I wanted my school teacher here I would have invited him...
