I'm not an arty person, I'm an engineer, logical, analytical, rational; I can't play music and I barely know which end of a paintbrush to hold although I can write a bit and my emotions flow close to the surface.
Anyway; over the years I have had a number of enjoyable (sometimes heated) arguments with arty people regarding what constitutes art and not one of them has been able to provide an explanation which made sense to me so I concluded that "art is in the eye of the beholder." And they mainly disagreed with me here too! One rather wild female even threw a glass of wine in my face, she was so angry - she was sexy though :)
My assertion is that if you are going to claim something is "good art" then you need to be able to define art otherwise what is the basis of your measurement which differentiates good art from bad art? Is a random pile of bricks at the National Gallery in London (honest!) really "art"? I have my doubts.
But today I believe I can rest my case that art is in the eye of the beholder or, perhaps, the sheep who follows the herd :)
This reminds me of something myself and a couple of mates did in year 10 high school. We were studying D.H. Lawrence in English so my mates and I decided to write a bit of verse and then we took it to the English teacher in the next period and told her we copied it from a text book of D.H. Lawrence in the library. The teacher liked it and we studied "what the author was saying in the verse" for the next two periods. If only she knew we were the authors.
This reminds me of something myself and a couple of mates did in year 10 high school. We were studying D.H. Lawrence in English so my mates and I decided to write a bit of verse and then we took it to the English teacher in the next period and told her we copied it from a text book of D.H. Lawrence in the library. The teacher liked it and we studied "what the author was saying in the verse" for the next two periods. If only she knew we were the authors.
So were those high school mates trying to emulate some of DH Lawrence 's style and story lines, to their own thoughts regarding their female English teacher?
I have seen some art in NSW ate gallery called Black Sheep on Black Paddock. In other words the reflective index between gloss & mat black paint. I think you can guess the layout... maybe gloss & mat in the wrong order!
On the other hand, I have been to Giverny to see the environment where an artist can create actual art (if you can get to Giverny without too many tourists you will really understand the paintings).
__________________
Procrastination, mankind's greatest labour saving device!
50L custom fuel rack 6x20W 100/20mppt 4x26Ah gel 28L super insulated fridge TPMS 3 ARB compressors heatsink fan cooled 4L tank aftercooler Air/water OCD cleaning 4 stage car acoustic insulation.
This reminds me of something myself and a couple of mates did in year 10 high school. We were studying D.H. Lawrence in English so my mates and I decided to write a bit of verse and then we took it to the English teacher in the next period and told her we copied it from a text book of D.H. Lawrence in the library. The teacher liked it and we studied "what the author was saying in the verse" for the next two periods. If only she knew we were the authors.
So were those high school mates trying to emulate some of DH Lawrence 's style and story lines, to their own thoughts regarding their female English teacher?