smwhiskey wrote:

---

 AI is only as good as the information that gets fed to it.  My understanding is that it retrieves information from the internet to formulate its response.  Garbage In = Garbage Out

---

 That's what worries me about it. 

dorian wrote:

---

I have an account. Does anyone have a question for the bot?

---

 Can it deduce a winning combination on Lotto Numbers?

Me: Can you tell me the winning numbers for next week's NSW Lotto?

AI: I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, I don't have access to information about future events, including the winning numbers for lotteries. Lottery numbers are determined by a random drawing, and there is no way to predict the outcome of such a drawing with complete certainty. I would suggest buying a ticket and hoping for the best, but please remember to gamble responsibly.

Me: Can you tell me the list of winners for the NRL this weekend?

AI: As an AI language model, I do not have access to real-time information, including the results of NRL matches. I suggest checking the official NRL website, sports news websites, or social media accounts of NRL teams or players to find the latest updates and results. They will have accurate and up-to-date information on NRL games and winners.

Me: Are poker machines bad for society?

AI:

Poker machines, also known as electronic gaming machines, are often a subject of debate regarding their impact on society. Some argue that poker machines can provide entertainment and generate revenue for the government and the hospitality industry, while others believe that they can have negative effects on individuals and communities.

One concern is that poker machines can be addictive, leading to problem gambling, which can result in financial and social problems for individuals and their families. Studies have shown that problem gambling can lead to depression, anxiety, and substance abuse, as well as relationship difficulties, job loss, and bankruptcy.

Additionally, there is evidence that areas with higher concentrations of poker machines tend to have higher levels of gambling-related harm, including crime and social issues. Some studies have suggested that poker machines can be particularly harmful to vulnerable groups, such as young people, low-income earners, and people with a history of gambling addiction.

Overall, the impact of poker machines on society is complex, and there are arguments both for and against their use. However, it is important to recognize that problem gambling can have significant negative consequences for individuals and communities, and that measures should be taken to address this issue.

Me: Do androids drem (sic, my typo) of electric sheep?

AI: The question "Do androids dream of electric sheep?" is a famous one, and it comes from the science fiction novel "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" by Philip K. Dick. In the book, humans have colonized other planets and use androids as servants and workers. The androids are designed to look and behave like humans, but they lack emotions and empathy.

In the book, the protagonist Rick Deckard is a bounty hunter tasked with "retiring" (i.e., killing) rogue androids who have escaped and are living on Earth illegally. As part of his job, Deckard becomes obsessed with the question of whether the androids are capable of experiencing empathy and emotions.

The title of the book suggests that the androids might dream of electric sheep, which is a way of exploring the idea of what it means to be human. While androids in the book do not literally dream, the title suggests that they might have some kind of inner life, even if it is different from that of humans. The question also raises philosophical questions about consciousness and the nature of reality.

In summary, the question "Do androids dream of electric sheep?" is a metaphorical one that explores the idea of what it means to be human and raises philosophical questions about consciousness and the nature of reality.

Me: What is different about the way that you and a human think?

AI: As an AI language model, I am designed to process and analyze vast amounts of data and information using machine learning algorithms, natural language processing techniques, and statistical models. Unlike humans, I do not have emotions, beliefs, or personal experiences. Therefore, my thinking is purely based on the patterns and relationships within the data I have been trained on, rather than personal biases or intuition.

In contrast, human thinking is influenced by various factors, such as emotions, beliefs, experiences, and cultural background. Humans can also learn from different sources, such as observation, experimentation, and personal interactions with others. Human thinking is more flexible and adaptable, and humans can use creative and critical thinking to solve complex problems and make decisions.

While AI language models like myself can process vast amounts of data quickly and accurately, we still have limitations in terms of understanding the nuances of human language, interpreting context, and using common sense. Additionally, we lack the creativity and intuition that humans possess, which can be important for certain tasks, such as generating original ideas or interpreting complex emotions.

Overall, while AI language models like me can perform some tasks faster and more accurately than humans, there are still significant differences in the way we think and process information compared to humans.

Me: What is the meaning of life?

AI: The meaning of life is a philosophical question that has been debated for centuries. There are many different perspectives on what the meaning of life is, and it ultimately depends on an individual's beliefs, values, and worldview.

Some people believe that the meaning of life is to find happiness and fulfillment, while others believe that it is to serve a higher purpose, such as spiritual or religious goals. Some argue that the meaning of life is to find meaning in one's own existence, while others believe that it is to contribute to the well-being of society or to leave a positive legacy for future generations.

In many ways, the meaning of life is a subjective concept that can vary depending on an individual's perspective and experiences. It is a question that may never have a definitive answer, but one that has inspired people to seek purpose and meaning in their own lives.

Ultimately, the meaning of life is a personal and philosophical question that each individual must explore and answer for themselves. It is a journey that can be influenced by many factors, including culture, religion, personal experiences, and values.

Cuppa wrote:

---

dorian wrote:

---

I have an account. Does anyone have a question for the bot?

---

 How about "How can you reassure me that if I ask you for information that your response will not be biased? " 

---

As an AI language model, my responses are generated based on the data I have been trained on and the algorithms used to process that data. I do not have emotions or personal biases, and I am designed to provide accurate and objective information to the best of my ability.

My training data comes from a diverse range of sources, including reputable academic and research institutions, government organizations, and reputable news outlets. This ensures that the information I provide is as objective and reliable as possible.

However, it is important to note that my responses are only as unbiased as the data I have been trained on. In some cases, the data may be incomplete or biased due to factors such as sampling errors or historical prejudices. Therefore, it is always a good idea to verify the information I provide with other sources to ensure its accuracy and completeness.

Overall, I am designed to provide objective and accurate information to the best of my ability, and I strive to be as unbiased and reliable as possible.

Me: Is Fox News a reputable news outlet? Would you rely on their information for your responses?

AI: As an AI language model, I don't have personal beliefs, emotions, or opinions. I am designed to provide information based on the data I have been trained on, and to the best of my ability, that information is objective, accurate, and unbiased. Therefore, my responses are not influenced by my personal views or opinions.

Regarding Fox News, they are a well-known news outlet in the United States that has a large audience and a reputation for being conservative in their coverage. While they have won awards for their journalism, they have also been criticized for their reporting and for allegedly prioritizing their political agenda over objective reporting. It is also worth noting that other news outlets may have different biases and reputations.

As an AI language model, I do not rely on any single news outlet for my information. Instead, my responses are based on a diverse range of sources, including academic research, government reports, and reputable news outlets, among others. Before using any information in my responses, I analyze it for accuracy and credibility, and I prioritize information from sources that are widely recognized as reliable and unbiased.

In summary, while Fox News is a well-known news outlet, the reliability and objectivity of their reporting can be debated. As an AI language model, I prioritize providing objective and accurate information, regardless of the source, and I rely on a diverse range of sources to ensure the credibility and accuracy of my responses.

Me: Is the Australian Broadcasting Corporation a reputable news outlet?

AI: Yes, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) is widely regarded as a reputable news outlet in Australia. It is a government-funded broadcaster that operates both television and radio programs, as well as online news services.

The ABC is known for its impartial and objective reporting, and it is required by law to maintain strict editorial independence from the government. The organization has won numerous awards for its journalism, including several Walkley Awards, which are highly respected in the Australian media industry.

The ABC has also been recognized for its commitment to accuracy and quality reporting. It has established a reputation for in-depth investigative journalism and for covering important issues that may not receive attention from other news outlets.

Overall, the ABC is a respected news outlet that is known for its impartial and objective reporting, and it is widely regarded as a reliable source of news and information in Australia.

Cuppa wrote:

---

Try "What is racism & how is it damaging to society, & does it have any benefits?"

---

Racism is a belief or attitude that one race is superior or inferior to others, and it often leads to discrimination and prejudice against people who belong to different racial or ethnic groups. Racism can manifest in various forms, including hate speech, discriminatory policies, and violent actions against individuals or communities.

Racism is damaging to society in many ways. It can create social divisions, exacerbate inequalities, and undermine social cohesion. It can also have negative impacts on individuals, such as reducing their opportunities for education, employment, and social participation, and increasing their risk of experiencing violence and discrimination.

Racism can also contribute to systemic inequalities and perpetuate historical injustices. For example, institutional racism in areas such as education, housing, and criminal justice can limit opportunities and outcomes for people of certain racial or ethnic groups.

There are no benefits to racism. While some people may argue that discrimination based on race can lead to social or economic advantages for certain groups, this argument is flawed and morally wrong. Racism harms both the individuals and the societies where it is practiced, and it runs counter to the principles of equality, justice, and human dignity.

Overall, racism is a damaging and harmful belief that can have negative impacts on individuals, communities, and society as a whole. It is important to recognize and address racism in all its forms, and to promote social inclusion, diversity, and respect for human rights.

dorian wrote:

---

Cuppa wrote:

---

Try "What is racism & how is it damaging to society, & does it have any benefits?"

---

Racism is a belief or attitude that one race is superior or inferior to others, and it often leads to discrimination and prejudice against people who belong to different racial or ethnic groups. Racism can manifest in various forms, including hate speech, discriminatory policies, and violent actions against individuals or communities.

Racism is damaging to society in many ways. It can create social divisions, exacerbate inequalities, and undermine social cohesion. It can also have negative impacts on individuals, such as reducing their opportunities for education, employment, and social participation, and increasing their risk of experiencing violence and discrimination.

Racism can also contribute to systemic inequalities and perpetuate historical injustices. For example, institutional racism in areas such as education, housing, and criminal justice can limit opportunities and outcomes for people of certain racial or ethnic groups.

There are no benefits to racism. While some people may argue that discrimination based on race can lead to social or economic advantages for certain groups, this argument is flawed and morally wrong. Racism harms both the individuals and the societies where it is practiced, and it runs counter to the principles of equality, justice, and human dignity.

Overall, racism is a damaging and harmful belief that can have negative impacts on individuals, communities, and society as a whole. It is important to recognize and address racism in all its forms, and to promote social inclusion, diversity, and respect for human rights.

---

 Couldn't have put it better myself!

I suspect you'll applaud it when it confirms your opinions and chastise it when it does not. 

Cuppa wrote:

---

Dorian can you ask - What information is required for someone to set up a ChatGPT account, who is the recipient of this information and will it be shared with third parties?

-- Edited by Cuppa on Thursday 23rd of March 2023 04:06:12 PM

---

I can't remember exactly, but I think all I had to provide was an email address. I did have the same reservations as you, but they turned out to be unfounded.

https://chat.openai.com/auth/login

Edit:

"Please note that phone verification is required for signup. Your number will only be used to verify your identity for security purposes."

AI says ...

"As an AI language model, I do not have access to any specific account setup for ChatGPT. However, I can provide you with general information about what might be required for setting up an account on a website or service."

Cuppa wrote:

---

Mike Harding wrote:

---

I suspect you'll applaud it when it confirms your opinions and chastise it when it does not. 

---

         There would be about as much point in doing that as that contained in your comment. 

---

As much as you would like it to be be not everything is about you Cuppa. I was talking to Dorian so back into your box.

PS. I think a gold medallion would look really good with that open chest shirt of yours. 

Mike Harding wrote:

---

Cuppa wrote:

---

Mike Harding wrote:

---

I suspect you'll applaud it when it confirms your opinions and chastise it when it does not. 

---

         There would be about as much point in doing that as that contained in your comment. 

---

As much as you would like it to be be not everything is about you Cuppa. I was talking to Dorian so back into your box.

PS. I think a gold medallion would look really good with that open chest shirt of yours. 

---

 Regardless of whom you claim to have been addressing my response to your comment stands.

As for what you think about me & trying to tell me what I should do. ....  no great surprise from someone who appears to be more a hit & run raspberry blower than a conversationalist. 

 Sorry to disappoint Aussie1, but there will be no more on that from me unless Mr Harding learns to be a little more socialised.

I'm happy to debate points of difference with folks but I cannot be bothered to persist with snipers like him

Chastise an AI Bot indeed.