check out the new remote control Jockey Wheel SmartBar rearview170 Beam Communications SatPhone Shop Topargee products
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Living limited to 75 years


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 220
Date:
Living limited to 75 years


There's a new Japanese language film out called, Plan 75. The plot is based on a government program, named Plan 75, which requires people to be euthanized when the turn 75 years old, in order to control an aging population.

 

I believe, truly, truly believe, that such circumstances will eventually become reality; maybe in 50 years time, maybe in 75 years time, maybe in 100 years time but definitely, certainly, absolutely will eventuate.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4706
Date:

I anticipate me, a Bunnings $7.50 charcoal BBQ and a *really* good single malt will do our thing sometime over the next ten years which will be before I turn 80.



__________________

 

"I beseech you in the bowels of Christ think it possible you may be mistaken"

Oliver Cromwell, 3rd August 1650 - in a letter to the General Assembly of the Kirk of Scotland



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4131
Date:

The issue was explored in "Logan's Run".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan%27s_Run



__________________

"No friend ever served me, and no enemy ever wronged me, whom I have not repaid in full."

Lucius Cornelius Sulla - died 78 BC 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 8721
Date:

Nothing new, Soylent Green was 1973.

__________________

Possum; AKA:- Ali El-Aziz Mohamed Gundawiathan

Sent from my imperial66 typewriter using carrier pigeon, message sticks and smoke signals.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2103
Date:

Possum3 wrote:

Nothing new, Soylent Green was 1973.





that was the one that popped into my head first, where the old ones got recycled into food.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 212
Date:

I think a better idea would be to get rid of the "useless" people in the world, such as the "real housewives of ...", anyone who goes on a "reality" TV show, etc., etc. Anyone who reaches 75 has proven they are an asset and would probably be more useful to society than all the freeloader types.

__________________
Derek Barnes


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 7578
Date:

The other day on the radio they said that old people contribute $75 billion to the economy in volunteer work annually. 

 

It our block of units it's only the old people doing all the maintenance.

 

One neighbour is mid 80s & does volunteer work for SES, administrations.



__________________

Procrastination, mankind's greatest labour saving device!

50L custom fuel rack 6x20W 100/20mppt 4x26Ah gel 28L super insulated fridge TPMS 3 ARB compressors heatsink fan cooled 4L tank aftercooler Air/water OCD cleaning 4 stage car acoustic insulation.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4131
Date:

Derek Barnes wrote:

I think a better idea would be to get rid of the "useless" people in the world, such as the "real housewives of ...", anyone who goes on a "reality" TV show, etc., etc. Anyone who reaches 75 has proven they are an asset and would probably be more useful to society than all the freeloader types.


Sounds like The Humanity Bureau:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Humanity_Bureau

In the future, war, climate and political agendas have robbed America of its resources. An agency called "the Humanity Bureau" ensures citizens are efficient. Inefficient citizens are deported to a city called New Eden [which is actually a death camp].

 



__________________

"No friend ever served me, and no enemy ever wronged me, whom I have not repaid in full."

Lucius Cornelius Sulla - died 78 BC 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1513
Date:

Derek Barnes wrote:

I think a better idea would be to get rid of the "useless" people in the world, such as the "real housewives of ...", anyone who goes on a "reality" TV show, etc., etc. Anyone who reaches 75 has proven they are an asset and would probably be more useful to society than all the freeloader types.


 I agree with your sentiments and would put social "influencers" at the top of the list for mandatory death no matter their age!



__________________

I reserve the right to arm bears :)



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 7578
Date:

I would actually suggest 'Hung, Drawn & Quartered'.



__________________

Procrastination, mankind's greatest labour saving device!

50L custom fuel rack 6x20W 100/20mppt 4x26Ah gel 28L super insulated fridge TPMS 3 ARB compressors heatsink fan cooled 4L tank aftercooler Air/water OCD cleaning 4 stage car acoustic insulation.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Derek Barnes wrote:

I think a better idea would be to get rid of the "useless people in the world" such as the "real housewives of ...", anyone who goes on a "reality" TV show, etc., etc. Anyone who reaches 75 has proven they are an asset and would probably be more useful to society than all the freeloader types.


 Wishful thinking Derek, but I like your thoughts! People who are well capable of supporting themselves, but choose to be part of a long line of no-hopers on social welfare would be the first to go. 

Social welfare is no longer considered a "helping hand" by grateful recipients, rather a lifestyle choice by bludgers. 

And now there seems to be a push to give these no-hopers even more "pay". Been busy this week driving, but I seem to remember reading that these no-hopers, and their do-gooder mates are pushing for a "pay" rate of 95% of the aged pension. 

What these clowns conveniently ignore is that the old-age pension is a well deserved support system for the thousands of Aussies who've worked hard and PAID TAX for decades. The modern social welfare bludger wouldn't even know how to spell "Tax", let alone undertake any activities where income Tax is likly to be payable. Cheers



-- Edited by yobarr on Friday 28th of April 2023 08:11:20 PM

__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2103
Date:

this discussion about people paying tax an being entitled to the age pension has been done before, an if my memory serves correctly what was payed in tax does not cover what will be paid out in pension (we are living longer) what tax we pay today covers todays pension payout not into the future.
at some stage super will be classed as an asset and the OAP will morph into a welfare payment.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Purchase Grey Nomad bumper stickers Read our daily column, the Nomad News The Grey Nomad's Guidebook