The real cost of net non-zero will become apparent after all of us are dead. So why should we care? (I don't, but for different reasons.)
Instead of listening to a bunch of right-wing talking heads, listen to the scientists who actually understand the subject. Then make up your mind. That is not to say that your opinion, or mine, are of any value, anyway.
-- Edited by dorian on Wednesday 20th of November 2024 12:45:03 PM
__________________
"No friend ever served me, and no enemy ever wronged me, whom I have not repaid in full."
The real cost of net non-zero will become apparent after all of us are dead. So why should we care? I don't, but for different reasons.
Instead of listening to a bunch of right-wing talking heads, listen to the scientists who actually understand the subject. Then make up your mind.
I wonder if you actually took the time to watch the doco, because your post smacks like an emu with its head in the sand, not wanting to listen to evidence that may require you question what we are being told.
One question that boggles the reality of the cost of renewables, why does the state with almost total deoendancy on the cheoest form of power have the highest power prices in Australia. Yes South Australia is the state, when the sun dont shine and the wind dont blow it relies on 2 interstate interconnectors,
I do read right wing publications, but only those that are produced by intelligent, trustworthy commentators. Intelligence and truth are commodities which are in short supply in Murdoch's media. Yes, I did once give Sky News a go, but it quickly became apparent that I was wasting my time.
On the subject of climate change, there is nothing more to talk about that hasn't already been discussed. As I understand it, it's either bite the bullet and pay now, or suffer the consequences and pay a lot more later.
__________________
"No friend ever served me, and no enemy ever wronged me, whom I have not repaid in full."
I do read right wing publications, but only those that are produced by intelligent, trustworthy commentators. Intelligence and truth are commodities which are in short supply in Murdoch's media. Yes, I did once give Sky News a go, but it quickly became apparent that I was wasting my time.
On the subject of climate change, there is nothing more to talk about that hasn't already been discussed. As I understand it, it's either bite the bullet and pay now, or suffer the consequences and pay a lot more later.
So you consider long time ABC political editor, producer and presenter Chris Uhlmann not befitting your attention because he works for Sky News now, he has become less intelligent, untrustworty and untruthful. so sad you have a closed mind after swolling the lefty narritive of disinformation and missinformation of the climate change cohort.
